Arsenal vs West Ham

Saturday, February 22, 2025 at 3:00 PM UTC

Match Analysis

Arsenal vs. West Ham Match Report - 2025-02-22

1. Final Score: Arsenal 0 - 1 West Ham

The final score was a significant upset, with West Ham securing a 1-0 victory at the Emirates. The key reason behind Arsenal's defeat was their ineffectiveness in the final third. Despite dominating possession and creating numerous chances (20 shots), they only managed two shots on target. This lack of clinical finishing, coupled with a resolute defensive performance from West Ham, proved to be Arsenal's downfall. The absence of key attacking players due to injury also played a crucial role, forcing Mikel Arteta to deploy midfielder Mikel Merino as a makeshift striker, a move that ultimately did not pay off. West Ham, on the other hand, capitalized on a well-executed counter-attack and defended stoutly to secure the win.

2. Key Moments:

  • 44th Minute - Goal: Jarrod Bowen scored the decisive goal for West Ham just before half-time. A quick counter-attack, initiated from the edge of their own box, saw Aaron Wan-Bissaka deliver a pinpoint cross that Bowen headed home unmarked.
  • 73rd Minute - Red Card: Arsenal substitute Myles Lewis-Skelly was sent off for a professional foul on Mohammed Kudus. Initially given a yellow card, VAR intervened, and the referee upgraded it to a straight red, deeming it a denial of a clear goal-scoring opportunity. This reduced Arsenal to 10 men and further hampered their comeback efforts.
  • Substitutions: Arsenal's substitutions, including the introduction of Oleksandr Zinchenko for Declan Rice and Raheem Sterling late in the game, failed to inject the necessary spark into their attack. Ben White's return from injury as a substitute was a positive, but it wasn't enough to change the game's outcome.

3. Notable Performances:

  • Jarrod Bowen (West Ham): Scored the winning goal and was a constant threat on the counter-attack. His clinical finishing and ability to exploit Arsenal's defensive vulnerabilities were crucial to West Ham's victory.
  • Aaron Wan-Bissaka (West Ham): Provided the assist for Bowen's goal with an excellent cross and was solid defensively, limiting Arsenal's attacking threat down the right flank.
  • Max Kilman (West Ham): Kilman was a rock in the heart of the West Ham defence, repelling numerous Arsenal attacks and ensuring that Merino had a difficult afternoon.
  • Martin Odegaard (Arsenal): While not at his best, Odegaard tried to drive Arsenal forward and create opportunities. However, he lacked the support and clinical finishing from his teammates to make a significant impact.
  • Mikel Merino (Arsenal): While he had a brace in the previous game, Merino struggled as a makeshift striker, lacking the pace and finishing ability to trouble the West Ham defense. His limitations in this role were exposed, highlighting Arsenal's need for a recognized striker.

4. Tactical Overview:

  • Arsenal: Arsenal adopted their usual possession-based approach, aiming to control the game and create chances through intricate passing and movement. However, their lack of penetration in the final third and inability to break down West Ham's organized defense proved to be their undoing. Arteta's decision to start Mikel Merino as a striker was a gamble that didn't pay off, as he lacked the attributes to lead the line effectively. The absence of key attacking players forced Arsenal to rely on makeshift solutions, which ultimately limited their attacking threat.
  • West Ham: West Ham employed a defensive, counter-attacking strategy. They sat deep, absorbed Arsenal's pressure, and looked to exploit any defensive lapses with quick breaks. Bowen's goal was a perfect example of their counter-attacking prowess. Graham Potter set up his team to be defensively solid and disciplined, making it difficult for Arsenal to create clear-cut chances. The introduction of Evan Ferguson late in the game was a tactical move to stretch Arsenal's defense and provide a fresh attacking outlet. Potter's tactical plan worked perfectly, frustrating Arsenal and securing a valuable away win.

5. Pre-match Analysis:

The pre-match analysis correctly identified Arsenal as the favorites due to their home advantage and recent form. It also highlighted the potential for a high-intensity London derby and Arsenal's need to win to keep pace with Liverpool. The prediction of Arsenal winning 2-1 was incorrect, as West Ham secured a 1-0 victory.

What was right:

  • Arsenal's Home Advantage: The analysis correctly identified Arsenal's home advantage as a crucial factor. However, it failed to account for West Ham's ability to nullify this advantage with a strong defensive performance.
  • West Ham's Counter-Attacking Threat: The analysis accurately recognized West Ham's counter-attacking threat, which ultimately proved to be decisive in the game.
  • Key Players: The analysis correctly identified Jarrod Bowen as West Ham's main attacking threat.

What was wrong:

  • Overestimation of Arsenal's Attacking Prowess: The analysis overestimated Arsenal's ability to break down West Ham's defense, particularly in the absence of key attacking players. The reliance on Mikel Merino as a striker proved to be a miscalculation.
  • Underestimation of West Ham's Defensive Resilience: The analysis underestimated West Ham's defensive resilience and their ability to frustrate Arsenal's attacking efforts.
  • Prediction of Both Teams to Score (BTTS): The analysis predicted that both teams would score, which did not happen due to West Ham's strong defensive performance and Arsenal's lack of clinical finishing.
  • Probability Breakdown: The probability breakdown significantly overestimated Arsenal's chances of winning (60%) and underestimated West Ham's chances (15%).

How close it predicted the game result:

The pre-match analysis was not very close to predicting the game result. While it correctly identified some key factors, it failed to accurately assess Arsenal's attacking limitations and West Ham's defensive strengths. The prediction of an Arsenal win and BTTS was incorrect, and the probability breakdown was significantly off. The analysis underestimated West Ham's ability to secure a victory at the Emirates.