Liverpool vs West Ham

Sunday, April 13, 2025 at 1:00 PM UTC

Match Analysis

Okay, here is a detailed match report for the Liverpool vs. West Ham United Premier League game played on April 13th, 2025, based on the provided pre-match analysis and post-match reports.


Match Report: Liverpool vs West Ham United

Competition: English Premier League Date: 2025-04-13 Kick-off: 13:00 GMT Venue: Anfield, Liverpool


1. Final Score: Liverpool 2 - 1 West Ham United

Liverpool secured a dramatic late victory against a resilient West Ham side, moving them 13 points clear at the top of the Premier League table and needing just six more points to clinch the title.

Key Reasons Behind the Scoreline:

  1. Individual Brilliance: Liverpool relied heavily on moments of quality from their key players. Mohamed Salah provided a superb assist for the opener, Alisson Becker made several crucial saves to keep West Ham at bay, and Virgil van Dijk scored the decisive late winner.
  2. Set-Piece Execution: While West Ham defended resolutely for periods, Liverpool's threat from set pieces proved crucial, with Van Dijk powerfully heading home an Alexis Mac Allister corner for the winner.
  3. Late Drama & Resilience: Despite a nervy second-half performance and conceding a late equaliser through an unfortunate own goal, Liverpool demonstrated championship mentality by finding an immediate response to snatch all three points.
  4. West Ham Threat & Liverpool Lapses: West Ham, particularly through the dynamic Lucas Paquetá and Mohammed Kudus, caused Liverpool significant problems, especially in the second half. Liverpool appeared complacent and anxious at times, culminating in the defensive mix-up for the equaliser. West Ham created enough chances to potentially earn a point but lacked the final clinical touch (e.g., Füllkrug hitting the post late on).

2. Key Moments

  • Pre-Match Boost (LIV): Mohamed Salah's lucrative new contract extension until 2027 was announced just days prior, providing a significant morale boost for the club and fans heading into the crucial run-in.
  • 18' GOAL - Luis Diaz (LIV 1-0 WHU): Liverpool took the lead relatively early. Mohamed Salah, showing his class, delivered a precise diagonal pass with the outside of his left foot, finding Luis Diaz who finished clinically.
  • 86' OWN GOAL - Andy Robertson (LIV 1-1 WHU): West Ham grabbed a deserved equaliser late in the game under dramatic circumstances. A cross came into the Liverpool box, and a defensive mix-up saw Virgil van Dijk's attempted clearance strike teammate Andy Robertson, deflecting the ball past Alisson into the net. Robertson reacted angrily towards Van Dijk immediately after.
  • 89' GOAL - Virgil van Dijk (LIV 2-1 WHU): Just three minutes after being involved in the equaliser, Liverpool's captain redeemed himself emphatically. Alexis Mac Allister delivered an inviting corner, and Van Dijk rose highest, towering above Niclas Füllkrug to power a header past Alphonse Areola, sending Anfield into raptures. Van Dijk celebrated by kissing the Liverpool badge.
  • Post-Winner Scare (WHU): Even after Liverpool regained the lead, West Ham almost snatched a point back immediately, with striker Niclas Füllkrug heading against the post from a dangerous position.
  • Potential Penalty Controversy: Reports noted a moment where a shot appeared to strike James Ward-Prowse's arm in the West Ham box, but no penalty was awarded, much to the frustration of some Liverpool players and fans.

3. Notable Performances

  • Virgil van Dijk (Liverpool): A mixed but ultimately decisive performance. He was partly culpable for the West Ham equaliser after a mix-up with Robertson but showed immense character and leadership to score the crucial winning header just minutes later. His aerial dominance (winning all aerial duels reported) and set-piece threat were vital. His badge kiss celebration underlined his commitment amidst reports of an imminent contract extension.
  • Alisson Becker (Liverpool): Arguably Liverpool's Man of the Match. Returning from injury, the Brazilian goalkeeper made several outstanding saves, particularly in the second half when Liverpool looked vulnerable. He denied Kudus and Bowen among others, preventing West Ham from potentially taking the lead earlier. Described by Arne Slot as potentially his "best game of the season."
  • Mohamed Salah (Liverpool): Buoyed by his new contract, Salah looked sharp, especially in the first half. He provided a brilliant assist for Diaz's opener and constantly troubled the West Ham defence, particularly teenage full-back Ollie Scarles. His performance set a record for goal involvements in a 38-game season, surpassing Thierry Henry.
  • Luis Diaz (Liverpool): Provided relentless energy and scored the opening goal with a good finish. His direct running caused problems for West Ham's right side.
  • Lucas Paquetá & Mohammed Kudus (West Ham): The standout performers for the visitors. Both players operated with a degree of freedom, finding space between Liverpool's lines and creating numerous dangerous moments. Slot labelled Kudus "almost uncontrollable," and Van Dijk acknowledged the difficulty in marking the pair. Their creativity kept West Ham in the contest.
  • Alexis Mac Allister (Liverpool): Delivered the pinpoint corner for Van Dijk's winning goal, highlighting his importance from set-piece situations.

4. Tactical Overview

Liverpool (4-3-3):

  • Approach: Arne Slot's side aimed to control possession and utilise their high-energy pressing game, although reports suggest the intensity dropped significantly in the second half, bordering on complacency. They relied on quick transitions and the attacking threat of their full-backs and forwards. The focus was clearly on leveraging the individual quality of players like Salah, Diaz, and Van Dijk.
  • Execution: Liverpool started brightly, controlling the early stages and scoring through Salah's creativity and Diaz's finish. However, after the break, their performance became disjointed and nervy. They struggled to maintain control, allowed West Ham too much space (particularly Paquetá and Kudus), and became passive, seemingly waiting for the final whistle rather than killing the game off. Alisson's saves were crucial during this period. Slot's substitutions (Gakpo for Jota, Tsimikas for Robertson, Szoboszlai for Jones) were questioned by some analysts for failing to regain control and potentially adding to the chaos. Ultimately, their quality from a set piece secured the win, masking a flawed performance.

West Ham United (Likely 4-2-3-1 / Flexible):

  • Approach: Graham Potter set his team up, as expected, with a focus on defensive structure and resilience. They aimed to frustrate Liverpool, deny space in behind, and stay compact. Offensively, the plan appeared to be to grant creative freedom to Paquetá and Kudus, allowing them to operate in pockets of space and launch counter-attacks or create moments of individual brilliance. Set pieces via James Ward-Prowse remained a potential avenue, though less decisive on the day.
  • Execution: West Ham executed their defensive plan reasonably well for large parts of the game, limiting Liverpool despite conceding early. They grew into the match, particularly in the second half, pressing Liverpool effectively at times and exploiting the spaces afforded to them. Paquetá and Kudus were constant threats, driving forward and creating chances. They deservedly equalised, albeit via an own goal resulting from sustained pressure. They were unfortunate not to hold on for a point and even had a chance to level again after Van Dijk's winner. While showing fight and tactical discipline, they lacked the cutting edge to punish Liverpool further and couldn't defend the decisive late corner.

5. Pre-match Analysis Comparison

The pre-match analysis provided a reasonably accurate framework but missed the mark on the competitiveness and final details of the match.

What was right:

  • Predicted Winner: Correctly identified Liverpool as the likely winners.
  • Key Factors: Correctly highlighted the Anfield advantage, contrasting form, the importance of Salah (assist) and Van Dijk (winner), and the likely tactical approaches (Liverpool possession/press vs. West Ham defensive structure).
  • Key Players: Accurately pinpointed Salah, Van Dijk, Alisson, Paquetá, and Kudus (mentioned as needing assessment but was fit and influential) as key figures who significantly impacted the game.
  • Salah Contract: Correctly identified this as a positive factor for Liverpool morale.
  • Tactical Shape: The predicted formations (LIV 4-3-3, WHU defensive block) were broadly accurate.
  • Goal Market: The prediction of 'Over 2.5 Goals' proved correct (2-1 final score).

What was wrong:

  • Predicted Scoreline: The 3-0 prediction was significantly off. The match was far tighter and more dramatic than anticipated.
  • Comfort Level: The analysis predicted a "comfortable victory" with Liverpool dominating. The reality was a "nervy," "unconvincing" win where Liverpool "almost stumbled" and were arguably fortunate after a poor second half.
  • Both Teams To Score (BTTS): Predicted as 'Unlikely' due to West Ham's perceived lack of attacking threat under Potter. This was incorrect, as West Ham scored (via OG) and created several other good chances.
  • West Ham's Threat: The analysis perhaps underestimated West Ham's ability to trouble Liverpool, particularly the individual quality of Paquetá and Kudus, despite noting injuries to other attackers.
  • Clean Sheet Potential: Liverpool's defence was breached, contrary to the suggestion of good clean sheet potential.

Closeness of Prediction:

The pre-match analysis correctly predicted the winner and identified many key influencing factors and players. However, it significantly overestimated Liverpool's dominance and underestimated West Ham's resilience and attacking threat on the day. The prediction foresaw a routine home win, whereas the actual game was a hard-fought, dramatic encounter decided by a very late goal after Liverpool had conceded an equaliser and looked shaky. The core outcome (Liverpool win) was right, but the nature and scoreline of the victory were quite different from the forecast.